+49 (0) 89 - 12 50 10 30Iinfo@ehw‑partners.com

Alexander Ego authored the chapter regarding the law on corporate groups applicable to European stock corporations (Societas Europaea – SE) as well as the chapter concerning the freedom of establishment for European corporations and the free movement of capital in the fourth edition of Münchener Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz (vol. 7, 4th ed., 2017) which was recently released in 2017. The latter chapter discusses a broad variety of corporate law issues arising in connection with cross-border activities of European corporations, including potential liability risks for shareholders and board members, specific questions in the event of an integration of corporations into cross-border corporate groups of companies, the place of jurisdiction for international corporate law disputes under European law as well as the applicable law for cross-border corporate reorganizations.

The role of the Supervisory Board has seen considerable change which is reflected in the corporate communications. While Supervisory Boards operated in the background in previous times, they are nowadays in the frontlines from time to time, communicating with the public and investors. This raises various questions at the interface between communications and law which will be the subject of Hill+Knowlton Strategies’ and EGO HUMRICH WYEN’s discussion.

The prmagazin tested the press communication of law firms by way of an inquiry about class actions in connection with the “dieselgate scandal” at Volkswagen. EGO HUMRICH WYEN is ranked 2nd:

  1. Hogan Lovells
  2. EGO HUMRICH WYEN
  3. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
  4. Noerr
  5. Hengeler Mueller
  6. Allen & Overy
  7. CMS Hasche Sigle
  8. Gleiss Lutz
  9. Clifford Chance
  10. Taylor Wessing
  11. Linklaters

The communication of the Supervisory Board within a company is generally limited to the Mangement Board. Pursuant to its duties to report, the Management Board is required to provide the Supervisory Board with the information necessary for fulfillment of its obligations. The article deals with the current debate on whether the Supervisory Board is further entitled or even required to collect information from employees without involving the Management Board.

EGO  HUMRICH  WYEN